DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1986 Audi 200 vs 1986 Ford Sierra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Sierra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 200SpecificationFord Sierra
AudiMakeFord
200ModelSierra
1986Model year1986
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Audi 200SpecificationFord Sierra
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2393 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
136 HPPower143 HP
0 NmTorque216 Nm
—Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 200SpecificationFord Sierra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 200SpecificationFord Sierra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size—

Dimensions

Audi 200SpecificationFord Sierra
4807 mmLength4425 mm
1814 mmWidth1694 mm
1422 mmHeight1407 mm
1290 KgWeight—
2687 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1986 Audi 200 and 1986 Ford Sierra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Sierra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…