DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 HSV Caprice vs 2000 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HSVMakeHolden
CapriceModelCommodore
1998Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
249 km/hTop speed234 km/h
5733 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
292 HPPower306 HP
475 NmTorque460 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,4 lt
13,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 ZR16Tyre size225/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4989 mmLength4964 mm
1794 mmWidth1842 mm
1479 mmHeight1450 mm
1632 KgWeight1640 Kg
2826 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 HSV Caprice and 2000 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…