DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Calais vs 1998 HSV Caprice Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Calais

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHSV
CalaisModelCaprice
2000Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,9 s
0 km/hTop speed249 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5733 cc
306 HPPower292 HP
460 NmTorque475 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank83 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption13,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/55 R16Tyre size225/60 ZR16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4964 mmLength4989 mm
1842 mmWidth1794 mm
1450 mmHeight1479 mm
1670 KgWeight1632 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase2826 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Calais and 1998 HSV Caprice approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Calais leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…