DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Commodore vs 1998 HSV Caprice Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHSV
CommodoreModelCaprice
2000Model year1998
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,9 s
0 km/hTop speed249 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5733 cc
306 HPPower292 HP
460 NmTorque475 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank83 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption13,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/55 R16Tyre size225/60 ZR16
YesABS—

Dimensions

5084 mmLength4989 mm
1847 mmWidth1794 mm
1545 mmHeight1479 mm
1700 KgWeight1632 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase2826 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Commodore and 1998 HSV Caprice approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…