DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 HSV Avalanche vs 2005 Nissan Armada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Armada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HSVMakeNissan
AvalancheModelArmada
2003Model year2005
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
229 km/hTop speed185 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5552 cc
367 HPPower309 HP
475 NmTorque522 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank106 lt
—Urban consumption18,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,1 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption15,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
245/45 R18 YTyre size265/70 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5106 mmLength5255 mm
1942 mmWidth2002 mm
1654 mmHeight1913 mm
2026 KgWeight2480 Kg
2947 mmWheelbase3130 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 HSV Avalanche and 2005 Nissan Armada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…