DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan Armada vs 2003 HSV Avalanche Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Armada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeHSV
ArmadaModelAvalanche
2005Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
8Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

7,1 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
185 km/hTop speed229 km/h
5552 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
309 HPPower367 HP
522 NmTorque475 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
106 ltFuel tank75 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption—
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
15,5 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
265/70 R18Tyre size245/45 R18 Y
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5255 mmLength5106 mm
2002 mmWidth1942 mm
1913 mmHeight1654 mm
2480 KgWeight2026 Kg
3130 mmWheelbase2947 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan Armada and 2003 HSV Avalanche approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…