DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 GMC Yukon vs 2003 HSV Avalanche Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeHSV
YukonModelAvalanche
2005Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
9Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
156 km/hTop speed229 km/h
5967 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
324 HPPower367 HP
502 NmTorque475 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
123 ltFuel tank75 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption—
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
245/75 R16Tyre size245/45 R18 Y
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5570 mmLength5106 mm
2002 mmWidth1942 mm
1923 mmHeight1654 mm
2310 KgWeight2026 Kg
3302 mmWheelbase2947 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 GMC Yukon and 2003 HSV Avalanche approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…