2008 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 6.0 V8 (367 Hp) 2008Overall Score81.75/100
2008 Holden UTE vs 2004 GMC Yukon Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • GMC
Yukon
GMC Yukon 6.0 i V8 XL 2500 (324 Hp) 2004Overall Score82.5/100
WINNER
GMC Yukon
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden UTESpecificationGMC Yukon
HoldenMakeGMC
UTEModelYukon
2008Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats9
2Doors5
Performance
Holden UTESpecificationGMC Yukon
0 km/hTop speed156 km/h
5967 ccEngine displacement5967 cc
367 HPPower324 HP
530 NmTorque502 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Holden UTESpecificationGMC Yukon
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
—Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Holden UTESpecificationGMC Yukon
5040 mmLength5570 mm
1899 mmWidth2002 mm
1480 mmHeight1923 mm
1786 KgWeight2310 Kg
3009 mmWheelbase3302 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Holden UTE and 2004 GMC Yukon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableCadillac Escalade vs Holden UTE2004 and 2008 model years
VSImage unavailableChevrolet Suburban vs Holden UTE2004 and 2008 model years
VSImage unavailableBristol Blenheim vs Holden UTE2004 and 2008 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Excursion vs Holden UTE2004 and 2008 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableGMC Yukon vs Holden UTE2004 and 2008 model yearsComments are loading…