2004 • GMC
Yukon
GMC Yukon 6.0 i V8 XL 2500 (324 Hp) 2004Overall Score82.5/100
2004 GMC Yukon vs 2008 Holden UTE Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 6.0 V8 (367 Hp) 2008Overall Score81.75/100
WINNER
GMC Yukon
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
GMC YukonSpecificationHolden UTE
GMCMakeHolden
YukonModelUTE
2004Model year2008
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
9Seats2
5Doors2
Performance
GMC YukonSpecificationHolden UTE
156 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5967 ccEngine displacement5967 cc
324 HPPower367 HP
502 NmTorque530 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
GMC YukonSpecificationHolden UTE
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
245/75 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
GMC YukonSpecificationHolden UTE
5570 mmLength5040 mm
2002 mmWidth1899 mm
1923 mmHeight1480 mm
2310 KgWeight1786 Kg
3302 mmWheelbase3009 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 GMC Yukon and 2008 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableCadillac Escalade vs GMC Yukon2004 and 2004 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableGMC Yukon vs GMC Yukon2005 and 2004 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableChevrolet Silverado vs GMC Yukon2005 and 2004 model years
VSImage unavailableChevrolet Corvette vs GMC Yukon2004 and 2004 model years
VSImage unavailableJeep Grand Cherokee vs GMC Yukon2005 and 2004 model yearsComments are loading…