DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Bristol Blenheim vs 2008 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Bristol Blenheim

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BristolMakeHolden
BlenheimModelUTE
2004Model year2008
CoupeBody typePick-up
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

5,4 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5900 ccEngine displacement5967 cc
390 HPPower367 HP
500 NmTorque530 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank0 lt
18 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption14,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
225/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4825 mmLength5040 mm
1765 mmWidth1899 mm
1440 mmHeight1480 mm
1755 KgWeight1786 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase3009 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Bristol Blenheim and 2008 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Bristol Blenheim leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…