DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Holden UTE vs 2003 Ford Crown Victoria Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Crown Victoria

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeFord
UTEModelCrown Victoria
2003Model year2003
Pick-upBody typeSedan
2Seats6
2Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed177 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
243 HPPower227 HP
400 NmTorque369 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength5385 mm
1794 mmWidth1986 mm
1448 mmHeight1443 mm
1450 KgWeight1875 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2913 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Holden UTE and 2003 Ford Crown Victoria approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Crown Victoria leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…