DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Crown Victoria vs 2003 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Crown Victoria

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeHolden
Crown VictoriaModelUTE
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typePick-up
6Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,0 s
177 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
227 HPPower243 HP
369 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

5385 mmLength4861 mm
1986 mmWidth1794 mm
1443 mmHeight1448 mm
1875 KgWeight1450 Kg
2913 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Crown Victoria and 2003 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Crown Victoria leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…