DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Econoline vs 2003 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Econoline

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeHolden
EconolineModelUTE
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typePick-up
8Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,0 s
160 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
218 HPPower243 HP
393 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
132 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption—
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size205/65 R15

Dimensions

5382 mmLength4861 mm
2014 mmWidth1794 mm
2050 mmHeight1448 mm
—Weight1450 Kg
3505 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Econoline and 2003 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Econoline leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…