DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden UTE vs 2000 Mercury Mountaineer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeMercury
UTEModelMountaineer
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
243 HPPower218 HP
400 NmTorque391 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank79 lt
—Urban consumption15,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size225/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4790 mm
1794 mmWidth1875 mm
1448 mmHeight1830 mm
1450 KgWeight1800 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden UTE and 2000 Mercury Mountaineer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…