1999 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 5.0 i V8 HSV (243 Hp) 1999Overall Score72.75/100
1999 Holden UTE vs 2000 Holden UTE Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 5.0 i V8 HSV (243 Hp) 2000Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Holden UTE
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
72.75–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden UTESpecificationHolden UTE
HoldenMakeHolden
UTEModelUTE
1999Model year2000
Pick-upBody typePick-up
2Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Holden UTESpecificationHolden UTE
9,0 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
220 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
243 HPPower243 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Holden UTESpecificationHolden UTE
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
Dimensions
Holden UTESpecificationHolden UTE
4861 mmLength4861 mm
1794 mmWidth1794 mm
1448 mmHeight1448 mm
1450 KgWeight1450 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2731 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Holden UTE and 2000 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableMercury Mountaineer vs Holden UTE1999 and 1999 model years
VSImage unavailableHolden Calais vs Holden UTE2000 and 1999 model years
VSImage unavailableHolden Commodore vs Holden UTE2000 and 1999 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableHolden UTE vs Holden UTE2000 and 1999 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Explorer vs Holden UTE1999 and 1999 model yearsComments are loading…