1999 • Holden
Commodore
Holden Commodore 5.0 i V8 SS (243 Hp) 1999Overall Score72.75/100
1999 Holden Commodore vs 2000 Holden UTE Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 5.0 i V8 HSV (243 Hp) 2000Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Holden UTE
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
72.75–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden CommodoreSpecificationHolden UTE
HoldenMakeHolden
CommodoreModelUTE
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Holden CommodoreSpecificationHolden UTE
7,0 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
240 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
243 HPPower243 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Holden CommodoreSpecificationHolden UTE
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Holden CommodoreSpecificationHolden UTE
4885 mmLength4861 mm
1840 mmWidth1794 mm
1450 mmHeight1448 mm
1600 KgWeight1450 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2731 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Holden Commodore and 2000 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSMercury Mountaineer vs Holden Commodore1999 and 1999 model years
VSHolden Calais vs Holden Commodore2000 and 1999 model years
VSHolden Commodore vs Holden Commodore2000 and 1999 model yearsImage unavailableVSHolden UTE vs Holden Commodore2000 and 1999 model years
VSFord Explorer vs Holden Commodore1999 and 1999 model yearsComments are loading…