2000 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 5.0 i V8 HSV (243 Hp) 2000Overall Score73.75/100
2000 Holden UTE vs 1999 Holden Commodore Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Holden
Commodore
Holden Commodore 5.0 i V8 SS (243 Hp) 1999Overall Score72.75/100
WINNER
Holden UTE
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
73.75–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden UTESpecificationHolden Commodore
HoldenMakeHolden
UTEModelCommodore
2000Model year1999
Pick-upBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Holden UTESpecificationHolden Commodore
9,0 s0–100 km/h7,0 s
220 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
243 HPPower243 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Holden UTESpecificationHolden Commodore
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Holden UTESpecificationHolden Commodore
4861 mmLength4885 mm
1794 mmWidth1840 mm
1448 mmHeight1450 mm
1450 KgWeight1600 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2790 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Holden UTE and 1999 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableMercury Mountaineer vs Holden UTE2000 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableHolden Calais vs Holden UTE1999 and 2000 model yearsVSImage unavailableHolden Commodore vs Holden UTE1999 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableHolden UTE vs Holden UTE1999 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Explorer vs Holden UTE2000 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…