DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 GMC Yukon vs 2000 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMC YukonSpecificationHolden UTE
GMCMakeHolden
YukonModelUTE
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

GMC YukonSpecificationHolden UTE
156 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4807 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
278 HPPower265 HP
393 NmTorque430 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

GMC YukonSpecificationHolden UTE
PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption—
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

GMC YukonSpecificationHolden UTE
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
245/75 R16Tyre size225/60 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

GMC YukonSpecificationHolden UTE
5029 mmLength4861 mm
2004 mmWidth1794 mm
1943 mmHeight1450 mm
2350 KgWeight1450 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 GMC Yukon and 2000 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…