DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Lincoln Navigator vs 2000 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden UTE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeHolden
NavigatorModelUTE
1999Model year2000
SUVBody typePick-up
8Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5408 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
260 HPPower265 HP
468 NmTorque430 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
114 ltFuel tank80 lt
19,6 ltUrban consumption—
14,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
16,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
245/75 R16Tyre size225/60 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

5202 mmLength4861 mm
2030 mmWidth1794 mm
1948 mmHeight1450 mm
2520 KgWeight1450 Kg
3023 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Lincoln Navigator and 2000 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…