DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden UTE vs 2000 GMC Yukon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Holden UTESpecificationGMC Yukon
HoldenMakeGMC
UTEModelYukon
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Holden UTESpecificationGMC Yukon
0 km/hTop speed156 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement4807 cc
265 HPPower278 HP
430 NmTorque393 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Holden UTESpecificationGMC Yukon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank98 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Holden UTESpecificationGMC Yukon
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/60 R15Tyre size245/75 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Holden UTESpecificationGMC Yukon
4861 mmLength5029 mm
1794 mmWidth2004 mm
1450 mmHeight1943 mm
1450 KgWeight2350 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden UTE and 2000 GMC Yukon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…