DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Holden UTE vs 2005 Alfa Romeo 166 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 166

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeAlfa Romeo
UTEModel166
2003Model year2005
Pick-upBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,4 s
0 km/hTop speed245 km/h
3565 ccEngine displacement3179 cc
238 HPPower240 HP
320 NmTorque289 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption18,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,1 lt
—Average consumption12,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5052 mmLength4720 mm
1844 mmWidth1800 mm
1476 mmHeight1416 mm
1535 KgWeight1540 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Holden UTE and 2005 Alfa Romeo 166 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 166 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…