DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Alfa Romeo 166 vs 2003 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 166

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeHolden
166ModelUTE
2005Model year2003
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h—
245 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3179 ccEngine displacement3565 cc
240 HPPower238 HP
289 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank0 lt
18,3 ltUrban consumption—
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
12,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4720 mmLength5052 mm
1800 mmWidth1844 mm
1416 mmHeight1476 mm
1540 KgWeight1535 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2939 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Alfa Romeo 166 and 2003 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 166 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…