DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Buick Park Avenue vs 2003 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Park Avenue

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeHolden
Park AvenueModelUTE
2005Model year2003
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

7,7 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3565 cc
243 HPPower238 HP
380 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank0 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

5253 mmLength5052 mm
1897 mmWidth1844 mm
1458 mmHeight1476 mm
1780 KgWeight1535 Kg
2890 mmWheelbase2939 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Buick Park Avenue and 2003 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Park Avenue leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…