DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Holden UTE vs 2005 Mitsubishi Galant Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Galant

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeMitsubishi
UTEModelGalant
2003Model year2005
Pick-upBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3565 ccEngine displacement3828 cc
238 HPPower230 HP
320 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank67 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size215/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5052 mmLength4865 mm
1844 mmWidth1840 mm
1476 mmHeight1485 mm
1535 KgWeight1560 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Holden UTE and 2005 Mitsubishi Galant approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…