DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Holden UTE vs 2005 Chrysler 300 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler 300

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeChrysler
UTEModel300
2003Model year2005
Pick-upBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed219 km/h
3565 ccEngine displacement3518 cc
238 HPPower249 HP
320 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption16,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt
—Average consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
—Tyre size225/60 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5052 mmLength4999 mm
1844 mmWidth1881 mm
1476 mmHeight1481 mm
1535 KgWeight1746 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase3048 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Holden UTE and 2005 Chrysler 300 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler 300 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…