DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Holden Commodore vs 2005 GMC Yukon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeGMC
CommodoreModelYukon
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats9
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,8 s
0 km/hTop speed156 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5967 cc
320 HPPower324 HP
464 NmTorque502 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank123 lt
13 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
235/40 R18Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4891 mmLength5570 mm
1842 mmWidth2002 mm
1425 mmHeight1923 mm
1615 KgWeight2310 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase3302 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Holden Commodore and 2005 GMC Yukon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…