DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Hummer H2 vs 2004 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HummerMakeHolden
H2ModelCommodore
2004Model year2004
Off-road araç, SUVBody typeSedan
4Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h—
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5967 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
321 HPPower320 HP
488 NmTorque464 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
121 ltFuel tank75 lt
25 ltUrban consumption13 lt
12 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
315/70 R17Tyre size235/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4820 mmLength4891 mm
2063 mmWidth1842 mm
2080 mmHeight1425 mm
2901 KgWeight1615 Kg
3118 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Hummer H2 and 2004 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…