DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Saab 9-7X vs 2004 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-7X

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeHolden
9-7XModelCommodore
2005Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h—
191 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5327 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
304 HPPower320 HP
447 NmTorque464 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank75 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption13 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
255/55 R18Tyre size235/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4922 mmLength4891 mm
1915 mmWidth1842 mm
1791 mmHeight1425 mm
2165 KgWeight1615 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Saab 9-7X and 2004 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-7X leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…