DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Lincoln Navigator vs 2000 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeHolden
NavigatorModelCommodore
1999Model year2000
SUVBody typeEstate
8Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5408 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
300 HPPower306 HP
481 NmTorque460 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
114 ltFuel tank75 lt
19,6 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
14,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
18,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
275/75 R16Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5202 mmLength5084 mm
2030 mmWidth1847 mm
1948 mmHeight1545 mm
2532 KgWeight1700 Kg
3023 mmWheelbase2939 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Lincoln Navigator and 2000 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…