DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Holden Caprice vs 2000 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHolden
CapriceModelCommodore
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,7 s0–100 km/h—
230 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
306 HPPower306 HP
460 NmTorque460 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
14 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/55 R16VTyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5237 mmLength5084 mm
1847 mmWidth1847 mm
1459 mmHeight1545 mm
1735 KgWeight1700 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase2939 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Holden Caprice and 2000 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…