DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Commodore vs 1999 Holden Calais Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.75–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHolden
CommodoreModelCalais
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h—
240 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
243 HPPower243 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank73 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4885 mmLength5040 mm
1840 mmWidth1845 mm
1450 mmHeight1545 mm
1600 KgWeight1690 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2940 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Commodore and 1999 Holden Calais approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…