DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercury Mountaineer vs 2000 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeHolden
MountaineerModelCommodore
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,0 s
180 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
218 HPPower243 HP
391 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank73 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption—
11,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength4885 mm
1875 mmWidth1840 mm
1830 mmHeight1450 mm
1800 KgWeight1600 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercury Mountaineer and 2000 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…