DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Holden UTE vs 2000 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

72.75–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHolden
UTEModelCommodore
1999Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h7,0 s
220 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
243 HPPower243 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank73 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4885 mm
1794 mmWidth1840 mm
1448 mmHeight1450 mm
1450 KgWeight1600 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Holden UTE and 2000 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…