DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Commodore vs 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeChevrolet
CommodoreModelTahoe
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
240 km/hTop speed170 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement5328 cc
243 HPPower273 HP
400 NmTorque427 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank98 lt
—Urban consumption19,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,9 lt
—Average consumption15,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size265/70 R16 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4885 mmLength5052 mm
1840 mmWidth2068 mm
1450 mmHeight1960 mm
1600 KgWeight2419 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Commodore and 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…