DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Commodore vs 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Land Cruiser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeToyota
CommodoreModelLand Cruiser
2000Model year2005
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats8
4Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement4163 cc
200 HPPower135 HP
304 NmTorque280 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank95 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4884 mmLength4890 mm
1842 mmWidth1940 mm
1450 mmHeight1890 mm
1550 KgWeight—
2788 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Commodore and 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Land Cruiser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…