DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Explorer vs 2000 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeHolden
ExplorerModelCommodore
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
171 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
208 HPPower200 HP
339 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank75 lt
18,2 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
11,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
255/70 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4884 mm
1790 mmWidth1842 mm
1800 mmHeight1450 mm
1670 KgWeight1550 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Explorer and 2000 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…