1996 • Holden
Apollo
Holden Apollo 3.0 i V6 24V GS (185 Hp) 1996Overall Score64.5/100
1996 Holden Apollo vs 2012 Great Wall Cool Bear Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Great Wall
Cool Bear
Great Wall Cool Bear Cool 2012Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Holden Apollo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1.25 points.
64.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden ApolloSpecificationGreat Wall Cool Bear
HoldenMakeGreat Wall
ApolloModelCool Bear
1996Model year2012
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Holden ApolloSpecificationGreat Wall Cool Bear
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2958 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
185 HPPower105 HP
264 NmTorque138 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Holden ApolloSpecificationGreat Wall Cool Bear
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank45 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Holden ApolloSpecificationGreat Wall Cool Bear
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15HTyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Holden ApolloSpecificationGreat Wall Cool Bear
4725 mmLength3951 mm
1770 mmWidth1695 mm
1400 mmHeight1634 mm
1465 KgWeight1260 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2499 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Holden Apollo and 2012 Great Wall Cool Bear approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Apollo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…