DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mercury Sable vs 1996 Holden Apollo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Sable

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeHolden
SableModelApollo
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2958 cc
147 HPPower185 HP
230 NmTorque264 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5070 mmLength4725 mm
1850 mmWidth1770 mm
1410 mmHeight1400 mm
1535 KgWeight1465 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mercury Sable and 1996 Holden Apollo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…