1996 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.0 V6 (147 Hp) 1996Overall Score65.25/100
1996 Ford Taurus vs 1996 Holden Apollo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Holden
Apollo
Holden Apollo 3.0 i V6 24V GS (185 Hp) 1996Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Ford Taurus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TaurusSpecificationHolden Apollo
FordMakeHolden
TaurusModelApollo
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford TaurusSpecificationHolden Apollo
—0–100 km/h9,5 s
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2958 cc
147 HPPower185 HP
230 NmTorque264 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TaurusSpecificationHolden Apollo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TaurusSpecificationHolden Apollo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford TaurusSpecificationHolden Apollo
5070 mmLength4725 mm
1854 mmWidth1770 mm
1463 mmHeight1400 mm
1579 KgWeight1465 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Ford Taurus and 1996 Holden Apollo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…