DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Great Wall SUV vs 2002 Rover 45 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 45

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeRover
SUVModel45
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,8 s
140 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2237 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
105 HPPower113 HP
190 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength4517 mm
1725 mmWidth1696 mm
1820 mmHeight1394 mm
1760 KgWeight1225 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Great Wall SUV and 2002 Rover 45 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…