2002 • Rover
45
Rover 45 2.0 TD (113 Hp) 2002Overall Score60.25/100
2002 Rover 45 vs 2002 Great Wall SUV Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Great Wall
SUV
Great Wall SUV 2.2 i (105 Hp) 2002Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Rover 45
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 45SpecificationGreat Wall SUV
RoverMakeGreat Wall
45ModelSUV
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Rover 45SpecificationGreat Wall SUV
9,8 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
113 HPPower105 HP
260 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 45SpecificationGreat Wall SUV
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Rover 45SpecificationGreat Wall SUV
4517 mmLength4860 mm
1696 mmWidth1725 mm
1394 mmHeight1820 mm
1225 KgWeight1760 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2615 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Rover 45 and 2002 Great Wall SUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…