2002 • Rover
25
Rover 25 2.0 TD (101 Hp) 2002Overall Score60.25/100
2002 Rover 25 vs 2002 Great Wall SUV Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Great Wall
SUV
Great Wall SUV 2.2 i (105 Hp) 2002Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationGreat Wall SUV
RoverMakeGreat Wall
25ModelSUV
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationGreat Wall SUV
9,9 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
101 HPPower105 HP
240 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationGreat Wall SUV
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationGreat Wall SUV
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationGreat Wall SUV
3990 mmLength4860 mm
1688 mmWidth1725 mm
1419 mmHeight1820 mm
1130 KgWeight1760 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2615 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Rover 25 and 2002 Great Wall SUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…