DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Great Wall Steed vs 2014 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeRenault
SteedModelMegane
2016Model year2014
Pick-upBody typeCabriolet, Coupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
160 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2378 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
136 HPPower140 HP
0 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,3 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6 CVT
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5040 mmLength4485 mm
1800 mmWidth1811 mm
1730 mmHeight1434 mm
—Weight1540 Kg
3050 mmWheelbase2609 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Great Wall Steed and 2014 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…