DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Renault Scenic vs 2016 Great Wall Steed Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeGreat Wall
ScenicModelSteed
2014Model year2016
MinivanBody typePick-up
5/7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
190 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2378 cc
140 HPPower136 HP
195 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,1 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
205/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4573 mmLength5040 mm
1845 mmWidth1800 mm
—Height1730 mm
1505/1592 KgWeight—
—Wheelbase3050 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Renault Scenic and 2016 Great Wall Steed approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…