2014 • Mazda
5
Mazda 5 2.0i (144 Hp) 2014Overall Score57.25/100
2014 Mazda 5 vs 2016 Great Wall Steed Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Great Wall
Steed
Great Wall Steed 2.4i (136 Hp) 2016Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 5SpecificationGreat Wall Steed
MazdaMakeGreat Wall
5ModelSteed
2014Model year2016
MinivanBody typePick-up
7Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 5SpecificationGreat Wall Steed
13,1 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
186 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2378 cc
144 HPPower136 HP
180 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 5SpecificationGreat Wall Steed
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption—
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,3 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 5SpecificationGreat Wall Steed
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 5SpecificationGreat Wall Steed
4585 mmLength5040 mm
1750 mmWidth1800 mm
1615 mmHeight1730 mm
1450 KgWeight—
2750 mmWheelbase3050 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Mazda 5 and 2016 Great Wall Steed approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…