DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Great Wall Pegasus vs 2003 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeMG
PegasusModelZS
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
2237 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
105 HPPower113 HP
190 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4820 mmLength4520 mm
1870 mmWidth1700 mm
1700 mmHeight1390 mm
1710 KgWeight1225 Kg
—Wheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Great Wall Pegasus and 2003 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…