DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Great Wall Hover H6 vs 2014 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeKia
Hover H6ModelOptima
2014Model year2014
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
180 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1996 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
310 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
58 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption5,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,0 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
225/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4845 mm
1825 mmWidth1830 mm
1745 mmHeight1455 mm
—Weight1587-1648 Kg
2680 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Great Wall Hover H6 and 2014 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…