DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Mazda CX-5 vs 2014 Great Wall Hover H6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeGreat Wall
CX-5ModelHover H6
2014Model year2014
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
197 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
160 HPPower143 HP
208 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank58 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4640 mm
1840 mmWidth1825 mm
1710 mmHeight1745 mm
1488 KgWeight—
2700 mmWheelbase2680 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Mazda CX-5 and 2014 Great Wall Hover H6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…