2014 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0i 16V Hybrid (177 Hp) 2014Overall Score63.25/100
2014 Kia Optima vs 2014 Great Wall Hover H6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Great Wall
Hover H6
Great Wall Hover H6 Hover 2.0 (143 Hp) 2014Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationGreat Wall Hover H6
KiaMakeGreat Wall
OptimaModelHover H6
2014Model year2014
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationGreat Wall Hover H6
9,4 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
190 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
180 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationGreat Wall Hover H6
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank58 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationGreat Wall Hover H6
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size225/65 R17
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationGreat Wall Hover H6
4845 mmLength4640 mm
1830 mmWidth1825 mm
1455 mmHeight1745 mm
1587-1648 KgWeight—
2795 mmWheelbase2680 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Kia Optima and 2014 Great Wall Hover H6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…