DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Great Wall Cool Bear vs 2012 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cool Bear

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeAudi
Cool BearModelA3
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,5 s
160 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
105 HPPower105 HP
138 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears7 S tronic
—Tyre size205/55 R16; 225/45 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3951 mmLength4238 mm
1695 mmWidth1765 mm
1634 mmHeight1421 mm
1260 KgWeight1230 Kg
2499 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Great Wall Cool Bear and 2012 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cool Bear leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…